<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Comments for The 2008 Delphi Survey</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/plain" href="http://dn.codegear.com/article/37604" title="The 2008 Delphi Survey" />
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://dn.codegear.com/article/37604/feed" title="Comments for The 2008 Delphi Survey" />
<id>http://dn.codegear.com/article/37604</id>
<updated>2008-07-05T13:33:54-07:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>The 2008 Delphi Survey</title>
<author>
<name>Randall Santmann</name>
<uri>http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=41128</uri>
</author>
<id>http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=41128</id>
<updated>2008-05-22T11:16:07-07:00</updated>
<published>2008-05-22T11:16:07-07:00</published>
<summary>The 2008 Delphi Survey</summary>
<content>It has to be stable and fast!  Delphi 2007 keeps crashing on a weekly basis and losing all my work, and it is quite a bit slower than Delphi 7 (although admittedly faster than the previous version).</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The 2008 Delphi Survey</title>
<author>
<name>Igor Tkachenko</name>
<uri>http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=40953</uri>
</author>
<id>http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=40953</id>
<updated>2008-03-23T09:14:27-07:00</updated>
<published>2008-03-23T09:14:27-07:00</published>
<summary>The 2008 Delphi Survey</summary>
<content>First of all I appreciate your initiative of collecting feedback. But there are one demerit in ths survey, IMHO - it's too big. If you want to get more feedback and want to get better feedback I can recommend you to:1. Make this survey shorter (get rid of some obvious questions, like &quot;Would you like IDE be stable or you prefer it buggy, hanging and with a lot of Access Violations&quot;)2. Get rid of questions where you have to calculate percentage of feature importance. It was so difficult that I just wrote some numbers randolmly. Replace these questions to &quot;select&quot;3. Make some hints on futures (ie I don't know what does &quot;component-based license service&quot; mean in &quot;Would you use a component-based license service from CodeGear for your applications?&quot; question or what does &quot;RES file management in the Project Manager&quot; mean in IDE enhancements)P.S.I love Delphi and Pascal language for simplicity and used it for about 10 years for desktop and client-server applications. Now we are developing a desktop shareware product, and we have a very high neccessity in new platforms support (I mean Windows 64 bit support). But I haven't see any plans for it. So probably we should move to another product...</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The 2008 Delphi Survey</title>
<author>
<name>Neagu Laurentiu</name>
<uri>http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=40928</uri>
</author>
<id>http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=40928</id>
<updated>2008-03-13T15:01:07-07:00</updated>
<published>2008-03-13T15:01:07-07:00</published>
<summary>The 2008 Delphi Survey</summary>
<content>Repeat, your directions must be cross-platform development tools for VCL (specialy C/C++), not dependecies from Microsft !</content>
</entry>
</feed>
