﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <description><![CDATA[Comments for Transparency in Development: An Open Letter to the C++ Development Community]]></description>
    <title><![CDATA[Comments for Transparency in Development: An Open Letter to the C++ Development Community]]></title>
    <link>http://dn.codegear.com/article/33404</link>
    <!-- source: http://dn.codegear.com/article/33404/feed-->
    <dc:date>2008-08-28T19:00:57-07:00</dc:date>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[David,I'm a C/C++ Borland user from the first Turbo C (before I was a Turbo Pascal 3 user). I worked with ALL the versions of Turbo C, Turbo C/C++, idem for Windows, and Builder. Always a happy user and enthusiastic fan of Borland C/C++ quality and powerful features and useful addons and easy to use. Why think we are at risk now? Never have disapointed us.Borland has all my confidence and I appreciate this sincere message. And, most, I agree with the points you present.Jose]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[Transparency in Development: An Open Letter to the C   Development Community]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Jose Bastos)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=39688</guid>
      <dc:date>2006-11-25T07:40:10-08:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2006-11-25T07:40:10-08:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/33404/feed">Comments for Transparency in Development: An Open Letter to the C++ Development Community</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[just wonder to know, will borland provides a foundation version of C++ Builder 2006 to download? or will borland provides the free command line compiler tools and turbo debugger as free compiler tools 5.5?]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[Transparency in Development: An Open Letter to the C   Development Community]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (younker yang)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38780</guid>
      <dc:date>2005-12-03T08:31:33-08:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2005-12-03T08:31:33-08:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/33404/feed">Comments for Transparency in Development: An Open Letter to the C++ Development Community</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[Thanks for the update and all the hard work on C++ Builder.  I have been making my living with it since 1999 and plan to for many years to come.]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[Transparency in Development: An Open Letter to the C   Development Community]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Pete Warner)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38779</guid>
      <dc:date>2005-12-02T09:26:45-08:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2005-12-02T09:26:45-08:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/33404/feed">Comments for Transparency in Development: An Open Letter to the C++ Development Community</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[A honest release of information. A pleasant change from the BS from MS. I made the switch back to Delphi from C++B &amp; urge others to do the same. Here's why. Development in delphi pascal or C# is easier, faster &amp; more robust that C++ builder ever was.My compilation times are now lightning fast as i expect from Borland.Programming in Delphi Pascal or C# is an absolute joy. The code (and IDE) is more stable, easier to handle, more readable and thus self documenting. What more can one ask.Any 3rd party tools or components (eg Database/Fast reports/Rave etc) are more likely to be upto date and stable. ]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[Transparency in Development: An Open Letter to the C   Development Community]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (dean robinson)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38777</guid>
      <dc:date>2005-11-29T01:23:42-08:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2005-11-29T01:23:42-08:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/33404/feed">Comments for Transparency in Development: An Open Letter to the C++ Development Community</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[ÊÃ/ÀÌ!!!!! Ðàçáåã 100 ìåòðîâ, ñòåíà áåòîííàÿ!!!! Ñöóêî, âûïåé éàäó...]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[Transparency in Development: An Open Letter to the C   Development Community]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Craven Weasel)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38773</guid>
      <dc:date>2005-11-25T07:20:33-08:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2005-11-25T07:20:33-08:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/33404/feed">Comments for Transparency in Development: An Open Letter to the C++ Development Community</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[Thanks anyways for the information, Robert.]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[re: There's something I can't understand...]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Ian Marteens)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38770</guid>
      <dc:date>2005-11-22T07:39:46-08:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2005-11-22T07:39:46-08:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/33404/feed">Comments for Transparency in Development: An Open Letter to the C++ Development Community</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[Since the last editor tricks are still quirky, I can't really see paying for MORE editor quirks.As for changes to the vcl/rtl stuff -&gt; most of it is free, you can get it NOW and use it for free without giving Borland a dime.  Why?  Because they didn't do the work, they just jammed free third party code into the core RTL without ever addressing if anyone at borland was qualified to maintain the code (if the third parties ever decide to do something else, get bored or obstinant, there is NO clear support here and no clear sign that borland is qualified to maintain the code - they get all huffy when you bring it up, but they never ONCE actually say "yes, we can fix anything that is broken".  Makes me wonder, and for several grand it should make YOU wonder too!)Frankly, there is ZERO reason to buy D2K6, unless you want to pay several grand for bug fixes to D2K5 that you SHOULD get for free (Borland's support policies are abysmal!)]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[re: There's something I can't understand...]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (C Johnson)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38768</guid>
      <dc:date>2005-11-21T10:45:46-08:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2005-11-21T10:45:46-08:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/33404/feed">Comments for Transparency in Development: An Open Letter to the C++ Development Community</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[Although, this does not address your concerns.   There is more in BDS2006 IDE than just Bug Fixes and C++.   Specifically Block Completion, and Live Templates and really nice features for coding.   And the debugger enhancements are nice as well.  Then there are several items that are specific to the Compiler and the VCL which help you increase the performance of your existing applications.Both cqn help you save time during development.]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[re: There's something I can't understand...]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Robert Love)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38767</guid>
      <dc:date>2005-11-21T07:48:15-08:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2005-11-21T07:48:15-08:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/33404/feed">Comments for Transparency in Development: An Open Letter to the C++ Development Community</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[I appreciate the approach being taken. It will allow me time to play with the new version while the final kinks are being worked out.This is the best - most honest approach available and it is a welcome improvement in developer relations.]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[Transparency in Development: An Open Letter to the C   Development Community]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Michael Gillen)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38766</guid>
      <dc:date>2005-11-21T06:45:08-08:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2005-11-21T06:45:08-08:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/33404/feed">Comments for Transparency in Development: An Open Letter to the C++ Development Community</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[Why should a Delphi 2k5 owner buy the upgrade to Dk26 at all? Do all those minor updates deserve my hardly earned money? Guys, this whole thing is out of control: you're charging the price of a full upgrade for some bugs corrected and an unstable and half cooked C++ "personality". I'm glad you recognize the problem in public, guys, but it should happen long time before, perhaps from the Delphi 7 launch.]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[There's something I can't understand...]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Ian Marteens)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38765</guid>
      <dc:date>2005-11-21T03:42:04-08:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2005-11-21T03:42:04-08:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/33404/feed">Comments for Transparency in Development: An Open Letter to the C++ Development Community</source>
    </item>
    <generator>Atom 1.0 XSLT Transform v1 (http://atom.geekhood.net)</generator>
  </channel>
</rss>