﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <description><![CDATA[Comments for ECO II and ASP.NET Web Applications]]></description>
    <title><![CDATA[Comments for ECO II and ASP.NET Web Applications]]></title>
    <link>http://dn.codegear.com/article/33281</link>
    <!-- source: http://dn.codegear.com/article/33281/feed-->
    <dc:date>2008-07-05T13:37:25-07:00</dc:date>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[Hi,Create first the database, manually, before invoking the create schema button...Cheers,Jimar]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[re: ECO II and ASP.NET Web Applications]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (amadeus Manager)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=40449</guid>
      <dc:date>2007-08-06T21:32:54-07:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2007-08-06T21:32:54-07:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/33281/feed">Comments for ECO II and ASP.NET Web Applications</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[When I am trying to generate a new schema from persistence data provider it is giving "System.invalid exception: OR mapping doesn't define any database" as error. I am unable to continue. Please give me the solution for this. I am using Borland Developer studio 2006.]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[ECO II and ASP.NET Web Applications]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (sirisha sa)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=39210</guid>
      <dc:date>2006-07-09T22:35:40-07:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2006-07-09T22:35:40-07:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/33281/feed">Comments for ECO II and ASP.NET Web Applications</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[Hi Bob"It would take a lot of processing power (and/or memory) to create a new instance of an EcoSpace for each incoming request"Actually creating a new EcoSpace is not processor intensive, it was always creating the PersistenceMapper that was intensive in ECO 1.The trade off you have to make is1) Do I want faster response times at the cost of memory2) Do I want to save memory at the cost of response timeHaving the EcoSpaces in a pool saves ECO from having to fetch objects from the database unless they have changed."The most resource-friendly solution would be to set SessionStateMode to Never, which discards the pooled EcoSpace after every request."It doesn't discard the EcoSpace, it merely returns it to the pool for reuse.]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[ECO II and ASP.NET Web Applications]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Peter Morris)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38620</guid>
      <dc:date>2005-08-23T08:29:05-07:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2005-08-23T08:29:05-07:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/33281/feed">Comments for ECO II and ASP.NET Web Applications</source>
    </item>
    <generator>Atom 1.0 XSLT Transform v1 (http://atom.geekhood.net)</generator>
  </channel>
</rss>