<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Comments for BDNradio: Delphi 2005 updates</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/plain" href="http://dn.codegear.com/article/33102" title="BDNradio: Delphi 2005 updates" />
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://dn.codegear.com/article/33102/feed" title="Comments for BDNradio: Delphi 2005 updates" />
<id>http://dn.codegear.com/article/33102</id>
<updated>2008-10-07T01:42:26-07:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>BDNradio: Delphi 2005 updates</title>
<author>
<name>C Johnson</name>
<uri>http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=38524</uri>
</author>
<id>http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38524</id>
<updated>2005-06-30T18:02:25-07:00</updated>
<published>2005-06-30T18:02:25-07:00</published>
<summary>BDNradio: Delphi 2005 updates</summary>
<content>Always interesting to see borland ADMIT that they knowingly ship us tools that are buggy and substandard.I'm kinda wondering what Borland's idea of &quot;acceptable&quot; actually is.  I had anticipated that D2K5 would be mostly stable by the second patch (as has been the pattern in the past), but this appears to not entirely be the case.Makes you wonder.</content>
</entry>
</feed>
