﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <description><![CDATA[Comments for Refactoring, Modeling, and MDA in .NET]]></description>
    <title><![CDATA[Comments for Refactoring, Modeling, and MDA in .NET]]></title>
    <link>http://dn.codegear.com/article/32461</link>
    <!-- source: http://dn.codegear.com/article/32461/feed-->
    <dc:date>2008-12-04T12:19:37-08:00</dc:date>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[I rated this as 1 due to it being present in my Delphi Direct under Delphi Developer Network. I thought I would get to an article, not to an advert for a conference from July.]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[Refactoring, Modeling, and MDA in .NET]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Tommy Nordvik)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=37856</guid>
      <dc:date>2004-11-22T01:51:22-08:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2004-11-22T01:51:22-08:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/32461/feed">Comments for Refactoring, Modeling, and MDA in .NET</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&gt;&gt; I mean, really: "Refactoring and Modeling with Together&gt;&gt;  for Visual Studio 2, and Model-Driven Architecture&gt;&gt;  with Delphi 8 for .NET"&gt;&gt; How would I know if this could possibly be useful&gt;&gt;  to my business if I have no sense of what this says?This response makes me want to say something rude like "where have you been hiding -- under a rock?" But I won't be that crass. Kevin, instead of critizing Borland for producing leading-edge articles, why not put "refactoring" into Google and start getting caught up? Many, if not most, Delphi developers have read about this stuff and know exactly what these terms mean. Borland cannot be expected to target articles to beginners when most of the audience is already up-to-speed on these technologies and hungry for advanced information. Dude, get busy on Google and Amazon. No one's going to spoon-feed this stuff to you. ]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[re: Refactoring, Modeling, and MDA in .NET]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Craven Weasel)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=37636</guid>
      <dc:date>2004-10-10T12:35:41-07:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2004-10-10T12:35:41-07:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/32461/feed">Comments for Refactoring, Modeling, and MDA in .NET</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[It would be far more helpful if posts like this (advising of some upcoming technology or discussion session) could give a short description of DEFINING TERMS, or at least giving some sense of what is being talked about!I mean, really:  "Refactoring and Modeling with Together for Visual Studio 2, and Model-Driven Architecture with Delphi 8 for .NET"How would I know if this could possibly be useful to my business if I have no sense of what this says?The problem is not limited to that post.  Our business is 90% dependent on our Delphi development, but I confess I feel left far behind on the exploding alphabet soup on my component palette.  It would be extremely helpful if Delphi invested not only in creating and adopting new technologies, but in giving clearer ideas of what they were all FOR.Comments and advice welcomed:  kevin@shsmedia.com-- Kevin Killion]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[Refactoring, Modeling, and MDA in .NET]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Kevin Killion)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=37519</guid>
      <dc:date>2004-09-02T07:52:16-07:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2004-09-02T07:52:16-07:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/32461/feed">Comments for Refactoring, Modeling, and MDA in .NET</source>
    </item>
    <generator>Atom 1.0 XSLT Transform v1 (http://atom.geekhood.net)</generator>
  </channel>
</rss>