﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <description><![CDATA[Comments for What's New in UML 2? The Use Case Diagram]]></description>
    <title><![CDATA[Comments for What's New in UML 2? The Use Case Diagram]]></title>
    <link>http://dn.codegear.com/article/30166</link>
    <!-- source: http://dn.codegear.com/article/30166/feed-->
    <dc:date>2008-12-04T12:33:32-08:00</dc:date>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[HiTechnically, the multiplicity on use cases were allowed in UML 1.3+ Also, you probably shouldn't refer the relationship as extends, even in the text (your diagrams are correct), as that's one of the most common errors made by people drawing use case diagrams by hand.Otherwise, very nice.Michael]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[What's New in UML 2? The Use Case Diagram]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Michael Chonoles)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38494</guid>
      <dc:date>2005-06-08T11:58:05-07:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2005-06-08T11:58:05-07:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/30166/feed">Comments for What's New in UML 2? The Use Case Diagram</source>
    </item>
    <generator>Atom 1.0 XSLT Transform v1 (http://atom.geekhood.net)</generator>
  </channel>
</rss>