<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Comments for What's New in UML 2? The Use Case Diagram</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/plain" href="http://dn.codegear.com/article/30166" title="What's New in UML 2? The Use Case Diagram" />
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://dn.codegear.com/article/30166/feed" title="Comments for What's New in UML 2? The Use Case Diagram" />
<id>http://dn.codegear.com/article/30166</id>
<updated>2008-07-04T20:16:07-07:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>What's New in UML 2? The Use Case Diagram</title>
<author>
<name>Michael Chonoles</name>
<uri>http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=38494</uri>
</author>
<id>http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38494</id>
<updated>2005-06-08T11:58:05-07:00</updated>
<published>2005-06-08T11:58:05-07:00</published>
<summary>What's New in UML 2? The Use Case Diagram</summary>
<content>HiTechnically, the multiplicity on use cases were allowed in UML 1.3+ Also, you probably shouldn't refer the relationship as extends, even in the text (your diagrams are correct), as that's one of the most common errors made by people drawing use case diagrams by hand.Otherwise, very nice.Michael</content>
</entry>
</feed>
