Comments for Interview with Ray Lischnerhttp://dn.codegear.com/article/300132008-12-04T12:06:17-08:00Uh... He's the *interviewER*!Christian Conradhttp://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=34849http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=348492003-06-25T16:19:56-07:002003-06-25T16:19:56-07:00Uh... He's the *interviewER*!The guy who wrote the article, like.Wow, and I thought people only posted *really* stupid stuff at Slashdot!And, Richard Carter: Clay's "self-promotion" isn't really any more "shameless" than many other writers here... (Ever read anything by Cary Jensen, for instance? :-)re: Interview with Ray LischnerRichard Carterhttp://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=34718http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=347182003-05-29T10:34:39-07:002003-05-29T10:34:39-07:00re: Interview with Ray Lischner>Who is Clay and why is there information about him at the bottom of an interview of Ray??Clay Shannon is the interviewer.>Wow, and I thought Borland only failed to proof read their manuals!If you're referring to Clay's shameless self-promotion of his own efforts,including "Warble McGorkle," I'm sure Anders Ohlsson, John Kaster,and other Borland staff are fully aware of it.Interview with Ray LischnerC Johnsonhttp://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=34685http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=346852003-05-26T05:00:48-07:002003-05-26T05:00:48-07:00Interview with Ray LischnerWho is Clay and why is there information about him at the bottom of an interview of Ray??Wow, and I thought Borland only failed to proof read their manuals!