﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <description><![CDATA[Comments for Borland Kylix 3 versus Linux GCC Development]]></description>
    <title><![CDATA[Comments for Borland Kylix 3 versus Linux GCC Development]]></title>
    <link>http://dn.codegear.com/article/29171</link>
    <!-- source: http://dn.codegear.com/article/29171/feed-->
    <dc:date>2008-09-08T00:20:00-07:00</dc:date>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[Serial]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[Borland Kylix 3 versus Linux GCC Development]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Adalberto César Matos)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=33666</guid>
      <dc:date>2002-12-02T14:01:35-08:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2002-12-02T14:01:35-08:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/29171/feed">Comments for Borland Kylix 3 versus Linux GCC Development</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[imho it is not product comparison, but methodology of software development. I agree with the contents of this article, it's true that using RAD tools speeds the develpment time and reduce costs, but the idea of making this comparision is the same as, for instance "Visual Basic" and "Borland Compiler"(command-line version)".]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[Borland Kylix 3 versus Linux GCC Development]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Stan Sawa)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=33300</guid>
      <dc:date>2002-10-11T11:52:22-07:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2002-10-11T11:52:22-07:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/29171/feed">Comments for Borland Kylix 3 versus Linux GCC Development</source>
    </item>
    <generator>Atom 1.0 XSLT Transform v1 (http://atom.geekhood.net)</generator>
  </channel>
</rss>