<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Comments for Calling All Delphi Developers!</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/plain" href="http://dn.codegear.com/article/26933" title="Calling All Delphi Developers!" />
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://dn.codegear.com/article/26933/feed" title="Comments for Calling All Delphi Developers!" />
<id>http://dn.codegear.com/article/26933</id>
<updated>2008-11-21T15:39:52-08:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>Calling All Delphi Developers!</title>
<author>
<name>Arash Mozaffari</name>
<uri>http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=28648</uri>
</author>
<id>http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=28648</id>
<updated>2001-04-16T14:27:10-07:00</updated>
<published>2001-04-16T14:27:10-07:00</published>
<summary>Calling All Delphi Developers!</summary>
<content>HelloI am from Iran.Please answer me that, How can I, that had been full access to LPT1 (All of 24 Pin for read and write without error) under windows by Delphi 5.Please answer me with a good example.My E-Mail is arash-mozaffari@noavar.comThank you.</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Calling All Delphi Developers!</title>
<author>
<name>John Stevens</name>
<uri>http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=28275</uri>
</author>
<id>http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=28275</id>
<updated>2001-03-09T06:02:11-08:00</updated>
<published>2001-03-09T06:02:11-08:00</published>
<summary>Calling All Delphi Developers!</summary>
<content>This survey didn't ask the right questions or was too narrow in the choices offered. I crammed comments into fields that wanted different inputs. I hope that someone sets up a better survey.May I suggest additional memo boxes for comments? You can always have them auto-delete once I've clicked the &quot;continue&quot; button. That would restrict the information you review to the info you actually want and still fulfill my need to vent my opinion. </content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Calling All Delphi Developers!</title>
<author>
<name>Espen Harlinn</name>
<uri>http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=28184</uri>
</author>
<id>http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=28184</id>
<updated>2001-03-02T00:37:55-08:00</updated>
<published>2001-03-02T00:37:55-08:00</published>
<summary>Calling All Delphi Developers!</summary>
<content>The questionaire doesn't touch the most important questions about Delphi. There are several areas where small changes to the VCL library should be made, and some features that could be added to the language. I'm thinking about the follwing things:Add the ability to register an win32 event object to a list of event objects in the TApplication object and use MsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx in the event loop.Add better collection classes trees, maps, sets, queues, dequeue and so on in a manner that lets the developer use the collections in the same manner as TCollection.Let the 'is' operator support interfaces too.let us use 'type' as a regular symbol name when it appears inside class definitions.</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Submit fails</title>
<author>
<name>Craven Weasel</name>
<uri>http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=28018</uri>
</author>
<id>http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=28018</id>
<updated>2001-02-21T07:20:39-08:00</updated>
<published>2001-02-21T07:20:39-08:00</published>
<summary>Submit fails</summary>
<content>nice, glad I took the time.</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Calling All Delphi Developers!</title>
<author>
<name>Mark Ericksen</name>
<uri>http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=28017</uri>
</author>
<id>http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=28017</id>
<updated>2001-02-21T07:08:37-08:00</updated>
<published>2001-02-21T07:08:37-08:00</published>
<summary>Calling All Delphi Developers!</summary>
<content>I don't appreciate that the survey does not account for multi-purposed developers. I use Delphi professionally at work and personally at home. At work I create customized software for our vertical market. At home I write GPL software as a hobby.I don't feel that the survey addressed the duality of purpose that many Delphi developers have. We use Delphi at work because it is a superior tool and we like the power that it gives us. We use Delphi at home (for hobby) for the same reasons but may not even intend to make a profit from our labors (GPL, Freeware, etc). I am also a Linux enthusiast who can't affort to pay $1000 to move my hobby develpment to Linux.I hope someone actually reads these things. :)-Mark </content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Calling All Delphi Developers!</title>
<author>
<name>Douglas Kiely</name>
<uri>http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=28011</uri>
</author>
<id>http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=28011</id>
<updated>2001-02-20T20:12:33-08:00</updated>
<published>2001-02-20T20:12:33-08:00</published>
<summary>Calling All Delphi Developers!</summary>
<content>The next to last question, &quot;16. What is your target market?&quot; probably could/should have been multiple choice, or at least break the question into two parts -- &quot;What is your primary target market?&quot;, with one choice or perhaps multiple choice, and &quot;What are your secondary target market(s)?, with one choice or perhaps multiple choice.Thanks for the survey though. It's a great to have been asked those questions.Can't wait for Kylix, not only to buy, but to actually use. :-)</content>
</entry>
</feed>
