﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <description><![CDATA[Comments for Object Pascal Style Guide]]></description>
    <title><![CDATA[Comments for Object Pascal Style Guide]]></title>
    <link>http://dn.codegear.com/article/10280</link>
    <!-- source: http://dn.codegear.com/article/10280/feed-->
    <dc:date>2008-07-05T13:21:38-07:00</dc:date>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[Please use a better Text Editor component.It is impossible to have a discussion about language syntaxif one cannot even post a properly formatted piece of code as example.(The text in my previous post got re-formatted).. That really sucks!]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[re: Object Pascal Style Guide]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Pieter Viljoen)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=41159</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-05-31T10:34:07-07:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2008-05-31T10:34:07-07:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/10280/feed">Comments for Object Pascal Style Guide</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[Thank goodness you are not on any design team ..no offence, but ...]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[re: Wrong, wrong , wrong ....]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Pieter Viljoen)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=41158</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-05-31T10:31:14-07:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2008-05-31T10:31:14-07:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/10280/feed">Comments for Object Pascal Style Guide</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[.. removed ..the post removed my indentation,which defeats the purpose.]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[Object Pascal Style Guide]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Pieter Viljoen)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=41156</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-05-31T10:25:29-07:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2008-05-31T10:25:29-07:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/10280/feed">Comments for Object Pascal Style Guide</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[Oh, God! I have never read such a bad article like this one! It has a long, "saying-about-nothing" introduction, followed by a badly formatted body, and... suddenly ends. The irony of this article is it is about formatting, but the format of the article is unrankable. Has it been written by a beginner?]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[Object Pascal Style Guide]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Truong Trung Dung)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=40808</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-01-23T14:10:05-08:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2008-01-23T14:10:05-08:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/10280/feed">Comments for Object Pascal Style Guide</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[The examples in section 8 show some loop and local variables (i,a,b,c,x) in lowercase. Is this an error or is there a rule missing?]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[Object Pascal Style Guide]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Leslie Kaye)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=40763</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-01-01T01:11:16-08:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2008-01-01T01:11:16-08:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/10280/feed">Comments for Object Pascal Style Guide</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[Is there an updated Style Guide document?In D2005/D2006 this statement causes some problems:"Block comments used to describe a method should appear before the method declaration."..using ctrl+shift+c once you insert a new method prototype the actual method is automatically created right after an existing comment moving that existing comment on the top of the new method! e.g.://comment for procedure Aprocedure A;beginend;//comment for procedure Cprocedure B;  &lt;-- new automatically inserted procedurebeginend;procedure C;beginend;]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[Object Pascal Style Guide]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Craven Weasel)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=39906</guid>
      <dc:date>2007-02-28T06:33:05-08:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2007-02-28T06:33:05-08:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/10280/feed">Comments for Object Pascal Style Guide</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;pre&gt;  test&lt;/pre&gt;]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[Object Pascal Style Guide]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Ijon Tichy)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38428</guid>
      <dc:date>2005-05-20T02:42:55-07:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2005-05-20T02:42:55-07:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/10280/feed">Comments for Object Pascal Style Guide</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[http://www.swissdelphicenter.ch/en/niklauswirth.php]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[re: Disagreement about 'begin']]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Craven Weasel)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38047</guid>
      <dc:date>2005-01-07T03:27:56-08:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2005-01-07T03:27:56-08:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/10280/feed">Comments for Object Pascal Style Guide</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[Where is 4.2.1?Section 8 needs some indexing attention.]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[Object Pascal Style Guide]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Craven Weasel)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38046</guid>
      <dc:date>2005-01-07T03:05:04-08:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2005-01-07T03:05:04-08:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/10280/feed">Comments for Object Pascal Style Guide</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[I entirely agree with Raymond, but with one addition, that sometimes is very useful. If logical statement becomes too complex, you may wish to indent it on braces. A sample worth many words:if      (a and b)  or ( (c and d)   and (e or f)   and (  h      and (i or j)       )     )  or (q &lt; r)  or (p and q) thenbegin...but in case of real, not example-like statements it should be more clear, I think.Sorry for my possibly terrifying English - ask me if something is unclear.]]></description>
      <title><![CDATA[re:Better way of formatting Logical Statements - "braces indentation"]]></title>
      <managingEditor>
	 (Sergiy Kheylyk)
</managingEditor>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=37268</guid>
      <dc:date>2004-07-06T22:36:43-07:00</dc:date>
      <pubDate>2004-07-06T22:36:43-07:00</pubDate>
      <source url="http://dn.codegear.com/article/10280/feed">Comments for Object Pascal Style Guide</source>
    </item>
    <generator>Atom 1.0 XSLT Transform v1 (http://atom.geekhood.net)</generator>
  </channel>
</rss>