http://dn.codegear.com/article/10280 2008-07-20T16:40:53-07:00 Pieter Viljoen http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=41159 http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=41159 2008-05-31T10:34:07-07:00 2008-05-31T10:34:07-07:00

re: Object Pascal Style Guide

Please use a better Text Editor component.It is impossible to have a discussion about language syntaxif one cannot even post a properly formatted piece of code as example.(The text in my previous post got re-formatted).. That really sucks! Pieter Viljoen http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=41158 http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=41158 2008-05-31T10:31:14-07:00 2008-05-31T10:31:14-07:00

re: Wrong, wrong , wrong ....

Thank goodness you are not on any design team ..no offence, but ... Pieter Viljoen http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=41156 http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=41156 2008-05-31T10:25:29-07:00 2008-05-31T10:25:29-07:00

Object Pascal Style Guide

.. removed ..the post removed my indentation,which defeats the purpose. Truong Trung Dung http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=40808 http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=40808 2008-01-23T14:10:05-08:00 2008-01-23T14:10:05-08:00

Object Pascal Style Guide

Oh, God! I have never read such a bad article like this one! It has a long, "saying-about-nothing" introduction, followed by a badly formatted body, and... suddenly ends. The irony of this article is it is about formatting, but the format of the article is unrankable. Has it been written by a beginner? Leslie Kaye http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=40763 http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=40763 2008-01-01T01:11:16-08:00 2008-01-01T01:11:16-08:00

Object Pascal Style Guide

The examples in section 8 show some loop and local variables (i,a,b,c,x) in lowercase. Is this an error or is there a rule missing? Craven Weasel http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=39906 http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=39906 2007-02-28T06:33:05-08:00 2007-02-28T06:33:05-08:00

Object Pascal Style Guide

Is there an updated Style Guide document?In D2005/D2006 this statement causes some problems:"Block comments used to describe a method should appear before the method declaration."..using ctrl+shift+c once you insert a new method prototype the actual method is automatically created right after an existing comment moving that existing comment on the top of the new method! e.g.://comment for procedure Aprocedure A;beginend;//comment for procedure Cprocedure B; <-- new automatically inserted procedurebeginend;procedure C;beginend; Ijon Tichy http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=38428 http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38428 2005-05-20T02:42:55-07:00 2005-05-20T02:42:55-07:00

Object Pascal Style Guide

<pre> test</pre> Craven Weasel http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=38047 http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38047 2005-01-07T03:27:56-08:00 2005-01-07T03:27:56-08:00

re: Disagreement about 'begin'

http://www.swissdelphicenter.ch/en/niklauswirth.php Craven Weasel http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=38046 http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=38046 2005-01-07T03:05:04-08:00 2005-01-07T03:05:04-08:00

Object Pascal Style Guide

Where is 4.2.1?Section 8 needs some indexing attention. Sergiy Kheylyk http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/userall?commentid=37268 http://threads.codegear.com/threads/threads.exe/view?commentid=37268 2004-07-06T22:36:43-07:00 2004-07-06T22:36:43-07:00

re:Better way of formatting Logical Statements - "braces indentation"

I entirely agree with Raymond, but with one addition, that sometimes is very useful. If logical statement becomes too complex, you may wish to indent it on braces. A sample worth many words:if (a and b) or ( (c and d) and (e or f) and ( h and (i or j) ) ) or (q < r) or (p and q) thenbegin...but in case of real, not example-like statements it should be more clear, I think.Sorry for my possibly terrifying English - ask me if something is unclear.